![]() ![]() In Caslon, stroke variation is more pronounced, serifs are more swift, lowercase letters have wedge-topped serifs, and the uppercase “A” has a crucial curve at the apex. Additionally, there are a few very fundamental differences between the two. First, in 1754 (the publication year of my book) Baskerville had literally just created his typeface. In fact, trying to determine the typography in “ A Sett of Anatomical Tables” is how I discovered this anomaly.Īfter much research and analysis, I decided that the font used in my book was, in fact, Caslon. This is an interesting point, because to the untrained eye the two fonts look nearly identical. Baskerville, however, suffered a lot of criticism during his time for his font being too difficult to read and unfriendly to the eyes. Baskerville, who created his typeface around 1754 (about 34 years after Caslon), also contributed heavily to the field of printing by creating original inks, becoming the first to use wove paper, and using heated copper for ink drying. Caslon is the face behind the majority of typography associated with American and English printing during the 1700s, and his type is considered the first high quality English production of its kind. When thinking of typography during the 18th century, there are two prevailing names associated with Transitional fonts: Caslon and Baskerville. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |